The median Realtor closes about 9 to 10 transaction sides a year, and only about 6% of individual agents report closing zero deals, so the viral claim that 71% of agents close nothing is not NAR data. The number that actually matters is the gap: top 1% agents close 50 or more sides a year, and team-based agents average about 32, versus the 9 typical, which is the difference between a side income and a real business.
I lead Elevate Group inside eXp Realty in the Brainerd Lakes Area, so I have a stake in what you decide after reading this. That is exactly why this article gives you the sourced numbers straight, including the ones that do not flatter teams. If you have ever typed “how many deals does the average real estate agent close” into Google, you were benchmarking yourself, and you deserve the real answer, not a recruiting scare or a sales pitch. Here it is, with the NAR data, the honest local math for central Minnesota, and what your own number actually means.
The Short Answer
The median Realtor closes about 9 to 10 transaction sides a year, and only about 6% of individual agents report zero transactions, so the viral claim that 71% of agents close nothing is not NAR data. Top 1% agents close 50 or more sides, and team-based agents average about 32 versus the 9 typical.
How many deals does the average real estate agent close a year?
The National Association of Realtors publishes the answer every year in its Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers. The typical, meaning median, Realtor closed 9 transaction sides in 2025, per the 2026 member profile, down from 10 in 2023 and 2024 and 12 in 2022. A transaction side counts representing one buyer or one seller, so a single home sale produces two sides: the listing side and the buying side. Ten sides a year does not mean ten homes sold, it means ten client representations.
The median matters more than the average here, because a small number of top producers pull the mean far above what most agents actually close. The median gross income for that typical Realtor was about $59,200 in 2025, and that is gross commission income, before the brokerage split, fees, marketing, and every other business expense. The honest way to read the benchmark: the middle of the profession is roughly one deal every five weeks, and the income is a modest living, not a windfall.
| Production tier | Sides per year | GCI at Crow Wing County medians (2.5% on $342,000) |
| Median Realtor, 2025 (NAR) | ~9 | ~$77,000 |
| Median Realtor, 2023-2024 (NAR) | ~10 | ~$85,500 |
| Team-based agent (NAR) | ~32 | ~$274,000 |
| Top 1% of agents | 50+ | ~$427,000+ |
Those GCI figures are simple arithmetic on sourced numbers: at Crow Wing County’s median sale price near $342,000, a 2.5% commission puts about $8,550 of gross commission on the table per side, before split and expenses. None of it is take-home pay. The point of the table is the shape of the profession: the median is low, and the distance from the median to the top is enormous, roughly five times at the 1% mark.
Is it true that 71% of agents close zero deals?
No, and you should know exactly where that number came from, because it is everywhere in recruiting content and it is used to sell fear. The “71% of agents closed zero deals last year” figure did not come from NAR. It originated from a Redfin executive’s comment at Inman Connect New York about a narrow slice of the profession called “active agents,” a group that makes up less than a third of all Realtors, and NAR has publicly said the claim is not its data. NAR’s own 2026 member profile shows only 6% of individual agents reported zero transactions, and 2% of teams.
The truth is uncomfortable in the other direction, and I will say it plainly: the median gross income near $59,200 is a hard number, most agents earn far less than the public assumes, and the career is genuinely difficult. You do not need an inflated scare statistic to know this is a demanding business. But when a recruiter or a lead vendor opens with “71% of agents fail,” they are selling you a problem they happen to sell the solution to. Decide with the real data instead, and the real data says the median agent does roughly 9 to 10 sides a year, not zero.
How many deals do top agents close, and what do they do differently?
Top 1% agents typically close 50 or more sides a year, about five times the median, and the published benchmarks say the top 20% of producing agents close about 65% of all transactions. The gap is not luck, and it is not mostly working more hours. The documented differences are boring and repeatable: speed to lead, a real database, and a system that runs without the agent reinventing it daily.
On speed: the industry benchmark for responding to a lead is roughly 5 minutes, while the average agent takes about 917 minutes, more than 15 hours, and about 78% of buyers work with the first agent who responds. On database: the average agent finishes the year with fewer than 400 active, segmented contacts, while the agents who sustain volume work a list of 300 to 500 people they stay in touch with on a schedule. On systems: the agents who close 30 or more sides a year are not more charming, they have a repeatable pipeline for follow-up, showings, and transactions that does not depend on mood. The full case against busywork is in the busy trap article, and it applies directly to the gap between 9 sides and 30.
How many deals should you close in the Brainerd Lakes Area?
The national median is a starting point, but our market changes the arithmetic in two ways, and both matter for your benchmark.
First, the season. Roughly one in three housing units in Crow Wing County is vacant or seasonal, and transaction volume collapses in the winter, so a local agent’s year is not a flat 12 months. The agents who sustain 20 or more sides here run a year-round pipeline that does not take the season off, which is the entire subject of finding consistent leads in a seasonal market. If your number is 9 sides but six of them land between May and August, you are not a 9-side agent, you are a seasonal agent with a pipeline problem.
Second, the price points. Lakefront and water-access listings in the area average well above $600,000, and at 2.5% a $650,000 side puts about $16,250 of gross commission on the table, nearly double the county-median side. That is why the local version of the benchmark is not just “how many sides,” it is “how many sides at what price.” Twenty lakefront sides can out-earn forty starter-home sides, and the honest local benchmark is gross commission income, not a count of transactions.
Why do team-based agents close about 32 sides while the typical agent closes 9?
This is the number every team, including ours, would like you to see, so let me give you the honest version of it. The NAR data shows team-based agents reporting roughly 32 sides against the 9 typical, and that gap is real. But it is a correlation, not a controlled experiment, and part of it is selection: productive agents who already have pipeline tend to join teams, so the 32-side average partly reflects who is in the group, not just what the group does for them.
The honest rest of it is that teams can supply the three things the top-agent data says matter: lead flow, so agents are not prospecting from zero; systems, so follow-up and transactions run on rails; and accountability, so the weekly numbers get reviewed by a human. If you join a team expecting the number to triple on its own, you will be disappointed. If you join one that shows you real per-agent production and hands you a pipeline you actually work, the 32-side average starts to make sense. The math of what that pipeline costs you is in should you trade a split for team leads, and the questions to ask before you sign are in what to ask a real estate team before joining.
How do you know if you are below average for the wrong reason?
Being below the median is only a problem if the cause is fixable and you are not fixing it. Five numbers tell you which kind of below-average you are:
1. Your sides over the last 12 months. The raw count, and how many landed in the summer months. This is your baseline, not your identity.
2. Your gross commission income. Compare it to the ~$59,200 median, not to a count of deals. If your GCI is healthy on few sides, you are fine.
3. Your active database size. Under 300 people you stay in touch with monthly means a lead-generation problem, not a lead problem. This is the most common cause of below-median production.
4. Your speed to lead. Hours or days between an inquiry and your first contact means you are losing deals you already paid for. The benchmark is minutes.
5. Your cost per closed deal. If bought leads are your main source and each closing costs more than the commission you keep, the pipeline itself is the problem. The full math is in are paid real estate leads worth it.
If you want the diagnosis in one sitting instead of five numbers, the agent business assessment scores your volume, leads, conversion, database, systems, and skill in about ten minutes and names the bottleneck. The income goal calculator then works backward from the income you want to the conversations per week it really takes, which is the honest way to see whether your target is a pipeline problem or a math problem.
What should you do with your number?
The honest decision framework, with no agenda attached:
Above the median and happy. Keep building. The data says most agents never reach 10 sides, so you are already ahead of the middle. Do not let a recruiter convince you that a good number is a failing one.
At the median and want more. Fix the system before you change the team. Database size, follow-up speed, and a weekly numbers review can move a 9-side agent to 15 without giving up a point of split. Going solo with a real system beats joining a team without one, and the full comparison is in join a team or go solo.
Below the median with a thin database. Your bottleneck is lead flow, and this is where a team pipeline can genuinely matter, or where buying leads can, if the cost per closed deal works. Run both sides of that decision in the team vs solo calculator before you commit to either.
When solo genuinely makes sense. If you already run the system, close 10 or more sides from your own sphere, and do not want to trade split for pipeline, stay solo. The median is beatable alone, and the top-agent data is mostly systems, not teams. The honest income reality for the other direction, whether the career is worth it at all, is in is real estate worth it in 2026.
The honest bottom line: the median Realtor closes about 9 to 10 sides a year, the 71% failure claim is not NAR data, and the real gap in this profession is between the median and the agents who run a system, whether they run it solo or inside a team. Your number is a diagnostic, not a verdict. If the diagnosis says your pipeline is the bottleneck and you want to see what a real, exclusive lead system looks like before you decide, we will show you ours with the numbers attached, and the decision stays yours either way.
Where These Numbers Come From
- NAR 2025 Profile of Realtor Members: median transaction sides and gross income
- HousingWire: NAR 2026 member profile, 9 sides and the 6% zero-transaction figure
- HousingWire: the viral 71% zero-transactions claim is not NAR data
- Inman: origin of the 71% claim at Inman Connect New York
- Redfin: Crow Wing County housing market, 2026
Noah Goedker
Team Leader, Elevate Group at eXp Realty
Noah Goedker is a third-generation real estate agent and lifelong resident of the Brainerd Lakes Area who leads Elevate Group inside eXp Realty. He publishes the sourced numbers about this business, including the ones that do not flatter teams, because agents who decide on real data make better decisions, and better decisions are better for everyone.